Showing posts with label Rules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rules. Show all posts

Monday, May 05, 2014

Commenting rule change

With the 2nd person being banned from this blog, I have decided to change the commenting system here. Now, all comments will be moderated before they are being published. Rest assured that, unless your comments violate any of the rules here, they will be published as long as Blogger shows them to me.

This blog, while publicly assessable, is considered as my blog. It is my small web space to comment and write about things that concern me. Just like a private building, I have the right to decide what rules apply and what don't. Commenting here is always a privilege. If you don't like what you read, you can either (1) Stop reading it, (2) Interact via comments, or (3) Write your own blog post criticizing me, to which I may or may not respond (Note: I don't have to respond to every critique). You can do anything you wish elsewhere, but here at my blog, you follow the rules set here, just as you would (hopefully) follow the rules of a private facility of which you are a guest.

Monday, February 07, 2011

Commenting, Interaction and Censorship

Before I begin, let me say and reiterate that I have nobody in mind. This comes about through many experiences.

The notion of blogging, commenting and censorship is something that needs to be taken into account especially when one does a blog. For me, I have set up rules for commenting in order that the blog meta does not descend into chaos. In other words, the rules are there so that fruitful discussion can take place.

While certainly commenting is a privilege (as after all the blog is owned by the owner), yet blogs function not merely as disseminators of information, but also as places of interaction. A blog whereby commenting is disallowed is in my opinion not functioning as a blog should but more as an online bulletin where the discourse is primarily one-way. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but I just do not see the rationale for calling it a blog in the full sense of the word.

While commenting is a privilege, that blogs function as places of interaction mean that inappropriate censorships should not take place. Such censorships defeat the entire purpose of interaction and let the dialogue be skewed by the blog owner and/or moderator. Therefore, the default for comments is that they are to be allowed to be posted, pursuant to abiding by the rules which are there to ensure productive dialogue. (For after all, who wants to have a flaming contest on the meta?) Rather, as long as the rules (which in my opinion are very generous) are followed, anyone with any position is allowed to post anything they wish which starts a dialogue on the post in question.

Occasionally, I have allowed comments with infractions to be published if they help to further dialogue or clarify issues. This is after all the reason why the rules exist. The rules are not after all rigid standards arbitrarily chosen but they exist for a purpose and thus, as I have said, I reserve the right to bend them if that would serve my intended purpose.

I must say that I tend to bring these rules into all forms of social interaction on the Internet, be it Multiply or Facebook. This may not be the thinking of others which causes me irritation, but at least it is true for me. I would probably need to work on my interactions elsewhere, but let me make it clear to all that interactions on all social media on my pages on the Internet follow these rules.

Friday, September 21, 2007

Rules on commenting

Here are the latest blog rules.

1) No vulgarities, sexual or other forms of innuendo, character assasination or threats allowed. Civilized discourse please.

2) Trolling is not allowed. Spamming too.

3) Comment must be related to post . If it doesn't, I will reserve the right not to approve it. Comments are moderated and those on the banned list will not be published. If you have any questions/ feedback not related whatsoever to the posts, email me.

4) Commenting is meant to foster actual conversation. Therefore, everyone who wish to comment must identify themselves. Limiting it to registered used helps to reduce potential spammers, but those who register anonymously just for commenting might quality as unidentified users and have their comments removed also.

5) Anyone who persistently refuses to interact with the points raised to his objection may have his subsequent comments deleted.

Any violation of these rules would make the comment liable to deletion and the poster to being banned. The blog owner's decision is final.