This blog is my personal blog. All views and articles expressed and written here are solely my own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my church or denomination or anyone else. Most posts are written for my own personal edification, and are not written in response to any external situation, unless otherwise and explicitly stated. Nobody should be reading into them anything other than what is explicitly stated, unless otherwise confirmed by me in writing.
Thursday, March 01, 2012
Dr. Richard Muller's talks at WSC
The last two days (Feb 28th and 29th 2012) saw Dr. Richard Muller gave lectures at Westminster Seminary California (WSC), which I was privileged to attend. The talks can now be heard in the resource center here:
If Calvin was not a Calvinist, how much more so is Van Til, Bavinck, and Kuyper not "Calvinists"?
Calvin Seminary is even more liberal than Westminster East and West. Calvin Seminary endorses Amyraldianism, common grace, and theistic evolution. Looks like general revelation trumps special revelation after all?
Muller is a church historian, not a systematic theologian. Just because he is from Calvin Seminary does not mean he has nothing to say to the church. I am after all not learning from him any systematics.
2 comments:
If Calvin was not a Calvinist, how much more so is Van Til, Bavinck, and Kuyper not "Calvinists"?
Calvin Seminary is even more liberal than Westminster East and West. Calvin Seminary endorses Amyraldianism, common grace, and theistic evolution. Looks like general revelation trumps special revelation after all?
@Charlie,
Muller is a church historian, not a systematic theologian. Just because he is from Calvin Seminary does not mean he has nothing to say to the church. I am after all not learning from him any systematics.
Post a Comment