tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post6735708948928359079..comments2023-09-01T16:11:44.564+08:00Comments on Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda): Exposition of 1 Tim. 5:17: On the office(s) of eldersDaniel Chttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-8681961393215838332007-05-03T10:27:00.000+08:002007-05-03T10:27:00.000+08:00Bull's Eye, Zane!This is exactly what I had been t...Bull's Eye, Zane!<BR/><BR/>This is exactly what I had been trying to express in my previous posts, Daniel.<BR/><BR/>To put it bluntly, ahem ... this is classic "double-talk."<BR/><BR/>Let's start paying the ruling elders who rule well. Let all elders teach. Shouldn't we?vincit omnia veritashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07129530005436270157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-44753313745050819812007-05-02T10:46:00.000+08:002007-05-02T10:46:00.000+08:00The Westminster Assembly debated this issue and re...The Westminster Assembly debated this issue and refused to apply 1 Tim 5:17 to dual eldership. See the works of Lightfoot and Selden.<BR/><BR/>Why would there be a need for teaching elders when all elders are enjoined to be didactic?<BR/><BR/>Furthermore, it is the ruling elders who are worthy or double honor, too, and assuming honor means money, where are the reformed churches which pay their Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-73927713330598081642007-04-27T18:00:00.000+08:002007-04-27T18:00:00.000+08:00Interesting arguments and an courageous attempt.Interesting arguments and an courageous attempt.Spiritual Israelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10200319633775230921noreply@blogger.com