tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post8431068493027774178..comments2023-09-01T16:11:44.564+08:00Comments on Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda): "Literalism" and fideismDaniel Chttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-84031758330315612792014-07-25T07:12:57.561+08:002014-07-25T07:12:57.561+08:00Just saw the appearance issue when I looked again....Just saw the appearance issue when I looked again. I will address it in timeDaniel Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-84258987734837289062014-07-25T05:53:36.514+08:002014-07-25T05:53:36.514+08:00@Ron,
the issue with strong words is that you spe...@Ron,<br /><br />the issue with strong words is that you spend 10+ pages insulting the intelligences of creationists. Yes, I know you have qualifiers like the examples of your grandfather. Would it be fine if I likewise do the same? So will you be fine if I say, "Most Theistic Evolutionists are idiots except for a few that I have met"? I doubt it.<br /><br />You see, the problem here isDaniel Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-85151696559820680672014-07-24T16:11:57.825+08:002014-07-24T16:11:57.825+08:00"Drivel"? "Manure"? Daniel, ..."Drivel"? "Manure"? Daniel, normally I wouldn't dignify a blogger who resorts to language like this with reply. Your words ironically confirm what I have written about the spirit that animates much though by no means all of contemporary creationism. Still, in the event that you are still open to reasoned dialogue in a spirit of friendship with those you disagree with, Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10149941888367753547noreply@blogger.com