tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post6996774658711583710..comments2023-09-01T16:11:44.564+08:00Comments on Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda): Flaws in Anselm's Ontological argumentDaniel Chttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-91000027557154115012010-09-18T02:27:34.786+08:002010-09-18T02:27:34.786+08:00@Michael:
Agreed. The identity of "God"...@Michael:<br /><br />Agreed. The identity of "God" is another problem with the ontological argument, and in fact almost every philosophical argument "from below" like the cosmological argumentDaniel Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-38412049444347174922010-09-17T21:02:45.814+08:002010-09-17T21:02:45.814+08:00Not to mention... QUALITIES as it were, come from ...Not to mention... QUALITIES as it were, come from God to begin with. As you say he had to presuppose something to form his argument. Where as the true christian world view must START with God, since there is no higher authority or source of truth.<br /><br />Additionally no logical argument for the existence of God can prove the God of scripture... how do you know its not the God of Islam, or aMichaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16964669097296964323noreply@blogger.com