tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post547413954961444336..comments2023-09-01T16:11:44.564+08:00Comments on Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda): Review: The Presbyterian Philosopher: The Authorized Biography of Gordon H. Clark by Doug DoumaDaniel Chttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-67820483082753397352017-03-21T12:12:45.882+08:002017-03-21T12:12:45.882+08:00Hi Ben,
thanks for your thoughts and feedback.
2...Hi Ben,<br /><br />thanks for your thoughts and feedback.<br /><br />2) Yes, you are right, which is why I used the word "some." Regardless, the focus of Douma's chapter was on the compromising Neo-Evangelicals, so Henry was mentioned less.<br /><br />3) I don't think I stated that Clark's occasionalism plays a great part in Clark's philosophy. I do think however that itDaniel Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-53489449271147843932017-03-20T20:55:47.229+08:002017-03-20T20:55:47.229+08:00Dear Daniel:
A very good review. : - )
1. Unlike...Dear Daniel:<br /><br />A very good review. : - )<br /><br />1. Unlike you, I read Cornelius Van Til before I read Gordon Clark.<br /><br />At one time in the early 1980s, I fancied myself to be a Van Tilian.<br /><br />In was a painful intellectual experience to accept that Clark was right and Van Til was wrong in the Clark-Van Til Controversy.<br /><br />2. Regarding the "Clark's boys&Benjamin Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15158087706682458142noreply@blogger.com