tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post3617846996641556806..comments2023-09-01T16:11:44.564+08:00Comments on Daniel's Place - (Reformata et semper reformanda): Exposition of 2 Peter 3Daniel Chttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-53568178991824866322008-12-29T22:17:00.000+08:002008-12-29T22:17:00.000+08:00Ed:So are you claiming to "understand Science"? I ...Ed:<BR/><BR/>So are you claiming to "understand Science"? I am in the Research field myself, so perhaps you would like to prove your statement: "rejection of evolution theory necessitates rejection of God's creation"? Since you claim to be an expert in Science, that shouldn't be a hard thing to do, right? I eagerly await your answer.Daniel Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00678184721218949112noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19775846.post-30325579506808139902008-12-29T07:57:00.000+08:002008-12-29T07:57:00.000+08:00You wrote: In our day and age, the “scientific” th...You wrote: <I>In our day and age, the “scientific” theory of Evolution aka Neo-Darwinism functions as the ruling paradigm for the scoffers of our age.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, I find more often the scoffers use criticism of evolution, most often because they fail to understand science, which means they dismiss God as the creator; but sometimes simply because they wish to lord it over others, Ed Darrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10056539160596825210noreply@blogger.com